[15:57:59] *** Joins: iangcarroll (uid74403@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xkssdlxoimfegnbg) [15:57:59] *** ChanServ sets mode: +v iangcarroll [15:58:41] gsingh93: probable spam, has changed genders in their profile photo more than once lol https://www.facebook.com/koko.ok.144 [15:58:42] Title: Facebook [15:59:21] *** Joins: majora (~majora@205.204.23.189) [15:59:21] *** ChanServ sets mode: +v majora [15:59:40] these spambots are so old... patient spammers [15:59:43] should we allow posts that are just shares of another group [15:59:44] Title: HX Public Group | Facebook [16:00:02] it's not directly part of the policy [16:00:17] but it seems pointless, especially in this case the poster just shared a post geared towards HH [16:00:19] well, to directly address your question, we mandate sharing HX Meta posts to HX if you want to talk about meta things in HX [16:00:26] so at least some sharing has to be allowed [16:00:33] yes [16:00:43] i am not sure about other kinds of sharing [16:00:46] okay [16:00:53] please look at the post in question [16:01:04] it isn't a "bad" post, but it has all that HH shit in it [16:01:09] such as "[Serious]" [16:01:13] and "Ask HH" [16:01:14] yea, saw it a second ago [16:01:41] yeah [16:01:45] what is your opinion [16:01:55] i dunno if it'd really be "better" if we made people actually post again [16:02:06] we end up with the post either way, lol [16:02:46] yeah, but it's kind of insulting to show we were a clear after thought to HH [16:02:47] lmao [16:03:15] fwiw Facebook will group those posts together in timelines if he made them independently (and you're in HH as well) [16:03:25] dunno if that happens when it's shared [16:03:25] fair enough [17:20:38] *** Quits: sivoais (~zaki@unaffiliated/sivoais) (Ping timeout: 244 seconds) [20:24:48] *** Quits: iangcarroll (uid74403@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xkssdlxoimfegnbg) (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) [22:13:05] *** Quits: majora (~majora@205.204.23.189) (Quit: Leaving)