[00:08:56] <clinth> woodruffw: so like, this depends on the language
[02:10:54] *** Quits: woodruffw (~yossarian@unaffiliated/cpt-yossarian/x-8375832) (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
[02:24:37] *** Joins: woodruffw (~yossarian@unaffiliated/cpt-yossarian/x-8375832)
[02:24:38] *** Quits: woodruffw (~yossarian@unaffiliated/cpt-yossarian/x-8375832) (Excess Flood)
[02:25:07] *** Joins: woodruffw (~yossarian@unaffiliated/cpt-yossarian/x-8375832)
[11:06:39] <gsingh93> clinth: yea, you can think of the type and value as two arguments, but i guess if you're not using a language that supports higher kinded types, you can't really think of the type as an argument
[11:06:56] <gsingh93> that sentence was horrible, but hopefully you get the idea :P
[11:06:57] <clinth> yeah
[11:07:15] <clinth> it took a second read, but I got it :p
[17:38:23] <m0shbear> >type an value as two arguments
[17:38:26] <m0shbear> templates?
[17:39:17] <gsingh93> that complicates it a bit more
[17:39:22] <gsingh93> because that stuff happens at compile time
[17:39:42] <gsingh93> it's a fuzzy boundary
[17:40:53] <m0shbear> are you going more for dynamic values represented as pairs of a handle to a type definition and a handle to data?
[17:41:28] <m0shbear> somewhat like llvm dynamic types of (enum, T) due to dynamic_cast sucking for multiple reasons
[17:41:28] <gsingh93> i think that sounds right?
[18:52:26] <woodruffw> clinth: in the sense that (typecast) isn't defined by the spec to be unary, yeah.
[18:52:42] <woodruffw> however, i'd say it's conceptually unary in all languages
[18:56:46] <clinth> what about c#'s "as"
[19:05:04] <clinth> <thing> as <other thing>
[19:07:23] <clinth> it's not like "the" prefix typecast we were talking about
[19:08:00] <clinth> but i'm curious how you can have a unary infix operator :p
[19:16:11] <woodruffw> clinth: yep, that's why i said (l|r)value
[19:16:53] <clinth> how common are those defined outside of a C or C++ context?
[19:17:39] <woodruffw> lvalue and rvalue? they're the standard terms when talking about language design, as far as i know
[19:31:51] <clinth> i dunno :p
[19:32:07] <clinth> http://mobihealthnews.com/content/rock-health-cb-insights-count-2b-35b-respectively-2016-health-funding?
[19:32:07] <yossarian-bot> Title: Rock Health, CB Insights count $2B, $3.5B respectively for 2016 health funding | MobiHealthNews
[19:32:09] <clinth> this is kinda dumb
[19:32:25] <clinth> analytics/big data with over $300 million in funding (Flatiron alone accounted for more than half of that with $175 million);
[19:32:31] <clinth> EHR/clinical workflow at $127 million;
[19:32:54] <clinth> flatiron health also sells an EHR...
[19:33:04] <clinth> zocdoc is dying